Hello,
I am using the helm chart v40.2.0. I deployed traefik into a cluster which already has ingress-nginx deloyed. The goal would be to migrate to traefik over time.
However when creating an ingress with traefik, that status and address aren't updated by traefik:
[18:10] garden:~% kubectl -n ungleich-canary get ingressNAME CLASS HOSTS ADDRESS PORTS AGEcanary-ingress-v1-nginx nginx canary.k8s.place10.ungleich.ch 2a0a:e5c0:10:3::6eeb 80, 443 49mcanary-ingress-v2-traefik traefik canary.k8s-v2.place10.ungleich.ch 80, 443 83s
The ingress does work, but argocd keeps spinning/seeing it in progressing.
Looking at both an nginx and a traefik ingress, the nginx operator fills in the address:
kubectl -n ungleich-canary get ingress -o yaml
apiVersion: v1items:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1kind: Ingressmetadata:annotations:argocd.argoproj.io/tracking-id: canary-ingress-v1-nginx:networking.k8s.io/Ingress:ungleich-canary/canary-ingress-v1-nginxkubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration: |{"apiVersion":"networking.k8s.io/v1","kind":"Ingress","metadata":{"annotations":{"argocd.argoproj.io/tracking-id":"canary-ingress-v1-nginx:networking.k8s.io/Ingress:ungleich-canary/canary-ingress-v1-nginx"},"name":"canary-ingress-v1-nginx","namespace":"ungleich-canary"},"spec":{"ingressClassName":"nginx","rules":[{"host":"canary.k8s.place10.ungleich.ch","http":{"paths":[{"backend":{"service":{"name":"canary-ingress-v1-nginx","port":{"name":"http"}}},"path":"/","pathType":"Prefix"}]}}],"tls":[{"hosts":["canary.k8s.place10.ungleich.ch"],"secretName":"canary-ingress-v1-nginx-tls"}]}}creationTimestamp: "2026-05-18T15:20:19Z"generation: 3name: canary-ingress-v1-nginxnamespace: ungleich-canaryresourceVersion: "771553221"uid: 3597297e-73a2-4e81-9e34-b1db4b455205spec:ingressClassName: nginxrules:
host: canary.k8s.place10.ungleich.chhttp:paths:
backend:service:name: canary-ingress-v1-nginxport:name: httppath: /pathType: Prefixtls:
hosts:
canary.k8s.place10.ungleich.chsecretName: canary-ingress-v1-nginx-tlsstatus:loadBalancer:ingress:
ip: 2a0a:e5c0:10:3::6eeb
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1kind: Ingressmetadata:annotations:argocd.argoproj.io/tracking-id: canary-ingress-v2-traefik:networking.k8s.io/Ingress:ungleich-canary/canary-ingress-v2-traefikkubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration: |{"apiVersion":"networking.k8s.io/v1","kind":"Ingress","metadata":{"annotations":{"argocd.argoproj.io/tracking-id":"canary-ingress-v2-traefik:networking.k8s.io/Ingress:ungleich-canary/canary-ingress-v2-traefik"},"name":"canary-ingress-v2-traefik","namespace":"ungleich-canary"},"spec":{"ingressClassName":"traefik","rules":[{"host":"canary.k8s-v2.place10.ungleich.ch","http":{"paths":[{"backend":{"service":{"name":"canary-ingress-v2-traefik","port":{"name":"http"}}},"path":"/","pathType":"Prefix"}]}}],"tls":[{"hosts":["canary.k8s-v2.place10.ungleich.ch"],"secretName":"canary-ingress-v2-traefik-tls"}]}}creationTimestamp: "2026-05-18T16:08:47Z"generation: 1name: canary-ingress-v2-traefiknamespace: ungleich-canaryresourceVersion: "771568689"uid: 0b3a03e6-dec1-41f7-9b8c-99fc10517766spec:ingressClassName: traefikrules:
host: canary.k8s-v2.place10.ungleich.chhttp:paths:
backend:service:name: canary-ingress-v2-traefikport:name: httppath: /pathType: Prefixtls:
hosts:
canary.k8s-v2.place10.ungleich.chsecretName: canary-ingress-v2-traefik-tlsstatus:loadBalancer: {}kind: Listmetadata:resourceVersion: ""
Both ingresses are using a clusterIP service.
The following is our argocd definition of the traefik instance:
project: default
source:
repoURL:
targetRevision: v40.2.0
helm:
valuesObject:
deployment:
replicas: 2
hostNetwork: false
ingressClass:
enabled: true
isDefaultClass: false
name: traefik
providers:
kubernetesCRD:
ingressClass: traefik
service:
spec:
type: ClusterIP
chart: traefik
destination:
server: https://kubernetes.default.svc
namespace: ingress-traefik
syncPolicy:
automated:
prune: true
selfHeal: true
syncOptions:
- CreateNamespace=true
The two pods are logging TLS errors, due to cert-manager still requesting/creating the certificate, but otherwise I don't see anything suspicious.
Does anyone see what the problem is?